A Mad Hatter’s Tea Party and Lies about a Mosque

A Mad Hatter’s Tea Party and Lies about a Mosque

Further to Mad Haters Party of USA (No Mosque near Ground Zero) and Beyond A Mad Hatter’s Tea Party? , a variety of proposed scenarios have been reported by various media outlets. These speak of a

1. Mosque at Ground Zero,

2. Mosque near Ground Zero,

3. Or a Mosque several blocks away from Ground Zero.

It makes one wonder which of these descriptions is correct, and what is an acceptable distance for a Mosque from the Ground Zero?

Beyond A Mad Hatter’s Tea Party?

For more: Beyond A Mad Hatter’s Tea Party?

Further to Mad Haters Party of USA (No Mosque near Ground Zero) Islam and Muslim bashing is the most spectacular sport in USA!

The Muslims did not conspire to kill Jesus and that’s why the term Islamo-Christian Culture does not exist!!

The Muslims respect Jesus and mother Marry and the Jews do not. Yet, they are revered as Judeo-Christian Culture!!!

One must wonder, “why is it so”?

Mad Haters Party of USA (No Mosque near Ground Zero)

Mad Haters Party of USA is mad indeed. They are also Islamophobic! It is cheap and popular.

No Mosque at Ground Zero

Robert Spencer praises Newt's intellectual leadership in identifying threat of radical Islam

Video: America at Risk: Camus, National Security, and Afghanistan

Newt Gingrich Praises Anti-Defamation League for Opposing Proposed Islamic Community Center near Ground Zero

Newt says WTC mosque construction is a "political act" on NY1 News

Newt Gingrich Statement on Proposed Mosque/Islamic Community Center near Ground Zero

Julia Gillard is John Howard in Drag

Julia Gillard is John Howard in Drag

Dissident writer and academic Scott Burchill on the dead heart at the centre of the ruling Labor party in Australia (and the Prime Ministership of Julia Gillard):

Caved in to miners within hours of becoming PM – not prepared to stand up to corporate power in the West, or defend the population's resources equity

Gushed to Obama – an "honour and privilege" just to speak to him, though we are allies in a (futile) war we are losing

Sucked up to Israel - expressed no concerns about the Dubai passport & identity theft or the flotilla massacre while deputy PM, and will not stand up to Israel lobby as PM

Backed the Afghan war unconditionally – without asking Obama any questions about McChrystal's dismissal, how long we need to have troops in occupation, what the exit strategy, etc,

Opposed same sex marriage – apparently the state decides which consenting adults can marry, not the adults, though her choice not to marry is hers alone

Copied Howard's Pacific solution on asylum seekers – substituting East Timor for Nauru, then abandoning it a few days later because the Timorese hadn't been properly consulted and opposed the idea when they eventually were

Endorsed a government imposed internet filter - then abandoned it a day later because the population opposes it and thinks they should decide what they can and cannot access, not the government

Lost the Government's two most competent ministers – Tanner can't stand her and what she did to Rudd, Faulkner opposes the Afghanistan commitment he was charged with implementing

It's not disappointing because only the naive believed she actually stood for something – principles or good policy, for example. If she did, she would have bailed on Rudd months ago. Concerns that someone from the left had risen to power were always risible – she is hated by her colleagues on the left more than she is by those on the right. She was only on the left of the party for the purposes of factional horse-trading and pre-selection.

What's more difficult to understand is that like Rudd, she will be rightly criticised for not standing for, or believing in, anything. Sadly, she is actually getting credit for "clearing the decks" before an early election, as if policies are dispensable as long as it is possible to hold on to power. This tells us more about modern Labor than anything. If she is re-elected, what will she do? Manage for the sake or managing? Every other idea and principle has been, or is being, trashed.

Anthrax Hoaxes and Muslims

Europol Report: All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 99.6% that Aren't, All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 94% that Aren't and The Gujarat Train Fire was an accident and NOT Islamic Terrorism the “Muslim Terrorists' Anthrax Attack” was not an Islamic Terrorism.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Anthrax hoaxes involving the use of white powder or labels to falsely suggest the use of anthrax are frequently reported in the United States and globally. Hoaxes have increased following the 2001 anthrax attacks, after which no genuine anthrax attacks have occurred. The FBI and U.S. postal inspectors have responded to thousands of "white powder events" and targets have included government offices, US embassies, banks and news organizations.^[1][2]

Anthrax hoaxes were sporadically reported in the 1990s,^[3] including a petri dish in an envelope labeled "anthrachs"[sic] sent to B'nai B'rith in Washington in 1997 that contained harmless Bacillus cereus,^[4][5][6] but a spate of anthrax threats followed the 1998 arrest of Larry Wayne Harris, a microbiologist and white supremacist. Harris released what he said was military-grade anthrax but was actually a harmless vaccine strain, but news coverage popularized the idea of anthrax among hoaxers.^[7][8] In response to these hoaxes, the CDC released guidance for public health authorities for handling bioterrorism threats.^[9]

In the month following the 2001 anthrax attacks, hundreds of hoaxes were reported worldwide.^{[10][11][12][13]} The Anti-Hoax Terrorism Act 2001 was passed by the US House of Representatives^[14] but never enacted,^[15] and legislation making terrorism hoaxes a federal offence was finally passed as part of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.^[16][17][18] Legislation was enacted in the UK in October 2001 so that anyone convicted of a hoax involving threats of biological, chemical, nuclear or radioactive contamination would face a seven year prison sentence.

One of the most prolific hoaxers was Clayton Waagner, an anti-abortion activist who mailed hundreds of anthrax hoax letters to abortion clinics in late 2001^[19] and who was convicted in December 2003.^[20][21] A Sacramento man, Marc M. Keyser, admitted to sending around 120 packages marked as containing anthrax in October 2008, which he says was to highlight the lack of preparedness of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and public for an anthrax attack. He was convicted in September 2009 of five counts of hoaxes and making threats^[22][23]and sentenced to four years in prison in late April 2010. ^[24]

Notable recipients of anthrax hoax letters include journalist Judith Miller, author of Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War, who received one at the New York Times offices in October 2001.^[25]

[edit] References

1. ^ Drogin, Bob (8 March 2009). "Anthrax hoaxes pile up, as does their cost". Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2009/mar/08/nation/na-anthrax-threats8. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
2. ^ Cole, Leonard A. (2009). The Anthrax Letters: A Bioterrorism Expert Investigates the Attacks That Shocked America--Case Closed?. Skyhorse Publishing. http://leonardcole.com.
3. ^ Carus, W. Seth; Center for Counterproliferation Research, National Defense University (2002). "Thrreatened Use (Anthrax Hoaxes)". Bioterrorism and biocrimes: the illicit use of biological agents since 1900. 8. The Minerva Group, Inc.. ISBN 1410100235. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1jEP8Ve4zwgC.
4. ^ Wald, Matthew L. (24 April 1997). "Suspicious Package Prompts 8-Hour Vigil at B'nai B'rith". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1997/04/25/us/suspicious-package-prompts-8-hour-vigil-at-b-nai-b-rith.html. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
5. ^ Bailey, Ronald (10 October 2001). "Anthrax Attack?". Reason. http://reason.com/archives/2001/10/10/anthrax-attack. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
6. ^ Kristof, Nicholas D. (12 July 2002). "The Anthrax Files". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/12/opinion/the-anthrax-files.html. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
7. ^ Tucker, Jonathan B. (July 1999). "Historical Trends Related to Bioterrorism: An Empirical Analysis". Emerging Infectious Diseases (CDC) 5 (4). http://origin.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol5no4/tucker.htm.
8. ^ "The Harris Hoax". ADL. http://www.adl.org/learn/anthrax/Harris.asp?xpicked=3&item=5. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
9. ^ "Bioterrorism Alleging Use of Anthrax and Interim Guidelines for Management -- United States, 1998". MMWR (CDC) 48 (4): 69–74. 1999. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056353.htm.
10. ^ Leask, Alexander; Valerie Delpech and Jeremy McAnulty. "Anthrax and other suspect powders: Initial responses to an outbreak of hoaxes and scares". New South Wales Public Health Bulletin (Csiro Publishing) 14 (12): 218–221. http://www.publish.csiro.au/nid/226/paper/NB03059.htm.
11. ^ Harris, Paul (21 October 2001). "Anthrax hoax chaos". The Observer (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/oct/21/anthrax.terrorism. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
12. ^ Kasindorf, Martin; Toni Locy (6 November 2001). "Anthrax hoaxes persist despite arrests". USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2001/11/06/hoaxes-usat.htm. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
13. ^ Murphy, Joe (21 October 2001). "Spore hoaxers face jail terms from today". Daily Telegraph (London). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1360077/Spore-hoaxers-face-jail-terms-from-today.html. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
14. ^ DePledge, Derrick (14 November 2001). "DeWine proposes tough law on anthrax hoaxes". Cincinnati Enquirer. http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2001/11/14/loc_dewine_proposes.html. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
15. ^ "H.R. 3209: Anti-Hoax Terrorism Act of 2001". Govtrack. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h107-3209. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
16. ^ "Violators of Military Hoaxes Act could receive fines, prison time". CID Lookout. U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command. http://www.cid.army.mil/documents/Lookout/Military%20Hoaxes_web.pdf. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
17. ^ Eggen, Dan (10 December 2004). "Measure Expands Police Powers". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A53452-2004Dec9?language=printer. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
18. ^ "S. 2845: Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004". Govtrack. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s108-2845. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
19. ^ "US anthrax hoax suspect arrested". BBC News. 6 December 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1695140.stm. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
20. ^ "Man is convicted in anthrax hoax case". Associated Press. 3 December 2003. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-12-03-anthrax-hoax_x.htm. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
21. ^ Clarkson, Frederick (10 December 2003). "The quiet fall of an American terrorist". Salon. http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2003/12/10/waagner/index.html. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
22. ^ Walsh, Denny (18 September 2009). "Sacramentan convicted for sending anthrax hoax messages". Sacramento Bee. http://www.sacbee.com/ourregion/story/2191521.html. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
23. ^ "Calif. man convicted in nationwide anthrax scare". Salon. 17 September 2009. http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/us/2009/09/17/D9APEMG81_us_anthrax_scare/. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
24. ^ http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/nw_20100427_9709.php
25. ^ Herbert, Bob (15 October 2001). "In America; Living With Fear". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/15/opinion/in-america-living-with-fear.html. Retrieved 10 December 2009.

[edit] External links

• Ronson, Jon (5 October 2002). "Hoax!". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/oct/05/anthrax.uk. Retrieved 10 December 2009.
• "Anthrax Hoaxes: From Baghdad to Las Vegas". ADL. http://www.adl.org/learn/anthrax/hoaxes.asp?xpicked=3&item=hoax. Retrieved 10 December 2009.

This terrorism-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Gas Chamber Bound Jews Free speech?

Gas Chamber Bound Jews Free speech?

Gas Chamber Bound Jews love to insult and abuse anyone without nay fear of prosecution! However, they are not even capable to answer a simple question without using offensive languages! Not only that they have murdered our free speech by removing this question below too!

Can You Answer Clearly Without Any Insult or Abuse?

Yahoo Q and A

Judaism is not a religion as they broke their covenant with God and Moses.

Jewish is not a race and they mixed with almost every races and lost that uniqueness to be recognize as race.

For example Arabs, Mongols, Saxons, Germanic, … are race. British is not a race. American is not a race.

These ungrateful and arrogant Jews also making mockery of Gaza victims! Their cruel mockery generated appropriate reply like the one below.

Ungrateful decedents of Jews! Hitler used to feed Jews too. Have you forgotten? Have you lived on air, lying and ungrateful Jews!?

Why do you have to maim and murder Palestinians for the last sixty years? Why are you robbing their lands?

Do You Call It Witch-hunt or Muslim Hunt?

Do You Call It Witch-hunt or Muslim Hunt?

If Raja Khan is guilty then we all are guilty of some crimes. I have given cash or otherwise to many individuals and groups, known and unknown to me, due to genuine and humanitarian reasons and grounds.

Then again UK jailed one 16 year old kid for collecting evidence and pictures of terrorising Muslims all over the world. Another 18 year old also went to jail in UK with much more fanfare for similar reasons. None of them were implicated with arms or any violent activities! (BBC Radio via 630 AM, Sydney - Saturday, 10 April 2010).

In Australia too, they have demonised, terrorised and imprisoned a 17 year old Zeky Mallah who lost his mum and dead within a period of four weeks time in 2001. Lonely kid, used to go to mosque and spoke emotionally. The Zionist media used to have a ball with him and the zionised administration used him to the hilt for their own existence! After all of those witch-hunt and euphoria, the court found he is not guilty of anything and he is incapable of harming anyone too! Would you believe seven anti-Terrorism cases are not really convincing too!

Raja Lahrasib Khan, Chicago Taxi Driver, Pleads Not Guilty To Aiding Al Qaeda

Excerpt from taxi list:

Mike Foulks on April 5, 2010 1:18 PM

If Khan is such a dangerous "terrorist financer" and the all-knowing all-powerful authorities had him under such damning surveillance, WHERE ARE ALL HIS CO- DEFENDANTS? THERE ARE NONE!!! Why? Because this entire case is a witch hunt with a desperate need of a witch...which was fulfilled by manipulating Raja Khan to accept cash, presumably and unverifiably for "Al Qaida", if he only says the magic words "Osama bin Laden". I got news for you. I am a cabdriver. If some fool wants to give me a $1000 tip if I promise to deliver it to Ilyas Kashmiri or whoever they designate, and I mean anybody...I AM TAKING THAT FOOLS' MONEY and whistling Dixie. Especially if they promise me more cold hard cash in the future. The government didn't catch any bogeyman. They're just trying to make Raja Khan into one. They found a sucker. I don't know how these FBI guys and U.S. Attorneys will be able to sleep at night if they persist in this persecution of a good man they provoked, enticed, and trapped.

Mike Foulks on April 5, 2010 12:35 PM

Here's a challenge to the Government who has the burden of proof before they essentially end this good man's life: PUBLICLY REVEAL ALL OF THE EVIDENCE AGAINST RAJA KHAN, EVERY NOTE, EVERY TAPE, FROM START TO FINISH. Then we can see just how "agents provocateurs" really act these days. Note to true investigative journalists: Why not go down to 630 S. Dearborn and have a talk with the American Friends Service Committee's Mike McConnell or his employee Prateek Sampat and ask them how they came to worm their way beside a guy a like Raja Khan with their so-called "TWO Project"? Ask them about the CPTDA and the UTCC while your at it. It should be illuminating conversation.Mr. Tang from Chicago

Peer Lindholdt of OZCABBIE – Let’s Talk About Taxis

Peer Lindholdt of OZCABBIE – Let’s Talk About Taxis

Answers to Questions on Notice: Mr Faruque Ahmed and Five Vital Components of the Taxi Industry are consistent with Faruque Ahmed’s Submission to the NSW Upper House Inquiry re Taxi Industry, Transcript of NSW Upper House Inquiry and Beyond A Call for the NSW Transport and Infrastructure Corruption Inquiry. All of those submissions and documents are supported by corroborative evidence.

I have been speaking to all available media outlets and I did my best to expose the taxi industry corruption for a long time. Taxi Mafia Inspired Blockade (Radio 2 UE) and Taxi Mafia Inspired Blockade (Radio 2GB) are self explanatory. However, where are your friends like Jools or Nelson? Did they expose any wrong doings rather than attacking migrants and aboriginals to become mini Reg Kermode at the expense of taxi drivers?! You also regularly promote dictatorial business empire (?) of your partner in crime Michael Jools! His consistently destructive, selfish, and opportunistic behaviour including financial impropriety are rewarded by you all of the time.

This time you wrote in your editorial (OZ Cabbie March 2010), “… Faruque Ahmed who continues to be an embarrassment…”. You also write in page 2 of the same issue, “… Faruque Ahmed and Michael Hatrick for themselves … “. You never wrote anything good about me and many other dedicated taxi industry activists!

Peer, you are one of three saints of Three Saints without Sanity! A Short History and Warning to Greedy People was dedicated to stop greed of yours.

Please Transcript of NSW Upper House Inquiry should you wish. Despite all of those restrictions, I spoke valiantly and sincerely. On the other hand you even lacked the courage to speak in person in front of the committee.

Last time you wrote, “ … a Muslim extremist like Faruque Ahmed should not have to be elected in the NSW TDA no mater how desperate the NSW TDA is …. When I asked you to provide an example of “Muslim Extremism” you failed to do present an iota of evidence in regard to my so called Muslim Extremism.

You also wrote, “… You Faruque are the true RACIST. You hate "whites" and Jews. You, with your fanatical emails and blogs, are doing more to damage any hope of racial harmony than anyone else I know, and in the process you are destroying the reputation of the NSW TDA.

Unlike the countries where you and your 'brothers' come from, here you Have freedom of speech and the right to express your opinion (as long as you don't incite violence or acts of terrorism). However, you have no right to associate your racist slurs and propaganda with an association which does not, I assume, share your views. … “

PEER

Source: East India Company to White Australia Policy

Historical background of racism and sectarianism rathe than taxi industry activism!

Peer's Peers exposes Peer Lindholt’s arrogance, ignorance and blatant racism.

Adolph Hitler to Ross Nelson demonstrates white supremacists’ superiority complex including St Peer of Copenhagen.

Geriatric Islamophobia again demonstrates pure racism and sectarianism rather than taxi industry activism.

In light of consistent racism and saturnism emanating from St Peer of Copenhagen, I again would like challenge Peer and any other White Supremacist to open the Danish East India Company first and then win the Battle of Plassey like Lord Clive and then commit suicide to escape hanging before re-establishing White Australia Policy. The issue is Taxi Drivers' Safety and do not try to divert that life and death issue by using race and religion cards without any justification!

Again Peer’s racist venom compelled me to write:

“Peer,

You were unhappy about Black, Brown, Yellow, Chinese and Asian taxi drivers! Now you are unhappy because those Black, Brown, Yellow, Chinese and Asian "accents" took over the government departments!! Mate, take it easy and get used to it.

Should you wish to bring back your beloved WHITE AUSTRALIA POLICY, you must have a World War 3, shattered Europe, totally destroyed European economy and desperate European refugees who would be willing to work for peanuts in Australia. I bet Europeans who are enjoying a "peace based" European economy and harmony would be interested in your beloved WHITE AUSTRALIA POLICY at all.

So, you got the choice! Asian, African, South American desperados would do the shit job like mine for peanut. Smart ones amongst these groups would initially do the crap jobs and then ultimately become bosses of the country because of their university degrees, determination and intuition. In the meantime, you and your Pauline Henson mobs can curse the "WOGs" from Mathew Talbot Hostel.”

Source: White Australia Policy or Destruction of Europe?

Conclusion: Peer, you are gutless wonder and you won’t publish my materials at your useless OZCABBIE magazine. However, I am inviting you to answer me at my blogs without and fear of favour.

Faruque Ahmed

Moderator

Sydney Taxi Corruption

Sunday, 14 March 2010